Some People Say…

The second installment of Larry Sinclair’s interview with the New Hampshire Herald seems to be running a bit late, so in lieu of that much anticipated second installment, I’ve decided to bring over some extraordinary comments from The Regulator:

Larry grants an interview to “The New Hampshire…who???”

The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting  different results…

Yankee Clipper of  The Regulator gave a link to The New Hampshire Herald website where an article about Larry Sinclair is displayed.  Above Sinclair’s “interview” is an “editorial” about Sinclair and his claims.  It reads in part:

[...]

This story is very important and timely because a few weeks ago, a number of women made unsubstantiated harassment allegations against Herman Cain. The media ran with the stories even when it was increasingly becoming very evident that the allegations had no legs. The uproar caused some character assassination for Cain and ultimately halted his campaign for president.

[...]

It is important that the Obama campaign comes out and tells the American people what is known or
unknown about the allegations that Larry Sinclair has made against Obama for all intents and
purposes.

We are not by any means attempting to suggest here that what Larry Sinclair has told us is the gospel 
truth. We’re not in a place to make that judgment. As you read the interview and make your own 
research, it is incumbent upon you to arrive at your own conclusions. That’s why we chose a Q&A 
format for the story.

Someone ought to tell the editor of this “newspaper” that he is just about four years late with his inquiry.  It seems he doesn’t know that the mainstream media has vetted Sinclair’s story from beginning to end and found absolutely no evidence to corroborate his story.

After four years of futile attempts to get attention, Larry Sinclair is trying once again to get publicity for his tired, old, debunked story.

It’s another general election year so Sinclair appears to be trying to recapture the moments when many people were listening and DONATING to his cause which was: ‘to get the word out’. However, back then the myth was new and everyone was curious, especially those who would rather have seen Hillary win the Democratic nomination for the presidency.

There were also the haters and bigots who just couldn’t stand to think of  a Black man becoming the possible nominee.

Yet, Larry Sinclair is as persistent as ever to resurrect the Obama/Sinclair/Donald Young ‘story’ again.  In my opinion it will be yet another EPIC FAIL.

Yesterday I read where someone called Sarah Palin an “attention whore”.  That name better suits Larry Sinclair.  Since February 2008, Larry Sinclair has been trying to “sell” his story.  There were no takers then, because:

• There was no limo driver to interview
• He failed the polygraph test
• Sinclair had no paper work to show he was even in Chicago at the time that he stated
• Sinclair allegedly gave some phone records to a NY Times reporter, but that was just to show how many times he called the Obama campaign and the reporter never reported on the case
• The alleged hotel record and Choice Hotel Reward letters were either redacted and/or manipulated and therefore disqualified by most observers as false evidence
• An investigation was commissioned to determine the veracity of the hotel receipt (rewards letter) and it was found to have been tampered with by the recipient of the letter/receipt

The above bullet points were summarized from: Deciphering Sinclair’s Evidence.

The Interview – Part 1:

Herald: Larry, it’s only recently we learned
about your story. It’s very surprising that no
major media has done much about it. I
watched your National Press Club interview
online. Was that in 2008?

Larry: Yes. It was on June 18, 2008.
Herald: Since then, what is new about the
revelations?

Larry: A lot has transpired in the fact that
one of the journalists at the press
conference in 2008 by the name of Wayne
Madsen; he’s been in journalism in
Washington DC for quite some time. And he’
s a former Navy intelligence. He is one of the
journalists that after the press conference
started writing articles similar to those of the
Politico.

But he had contacted me in 2009/2010 and
started telling me he has changed his mind
and started believing everything I had said.

The NH Herald claims that they will have more of this interview in their next issue so stay tuned…

An Example of Incredible Stupidity and Probable Sociopathy

Here is true immorality: ignorance and stupidity; the devil is nothing but this. His name is Legion. ~ Gustave Flaubert 

I was going through some of my earlier posts here on Sinclair Watch and came across this one…

First the back story:

Sinclair had been visited by the United States Secret Service on January 28, 2010 because he had been faxing threats to the POTUS, FLOTUS, Rham Emanuel and others.  He had an initial visit from the Secret Service,  prior to the one in question and this was a second visit because the President Obama was speaking at a local College near Sinclair’s place of residence.

This is what Sinclair reported:

My Baby sitter has finally left after Obama shut his mouth in Tampa. While one Secret Service Agent sat outside my home all morning/afternoon, another one was in my mothers home waking up a 69 year old ill woman who has nothing to do with what I say or write.

When I read that this morning I was infuriated.

Once again I ask…

What did Madeline Dunham have to do with anything Obama said or wrote? JUSTIFY YOUR ACTIONS Sinclair:

Friday, October 24, 2008

I JUST SPOKE WITH SENATOR OBAMA’S SISTER

I just spoke with Maya, the half sister of Senator Barack Obama in an effort to speak with Madelyn Dunham.

While I would have liked to ask Maya some questions, I decided out of respect to her (you could hear in her voice that now was not the time) I left a message with Maya for her Grandmother, and I will contact Maya at a later time with my questions.

The first call was disconnected by accident, but was answered by a gentleman answering the phone “Dunham residence…”

Posted By Larry Sinclair at 10:01 PM 23 comments Links to this post

Please keep in mind that Mrs. Madelyn Dunham, Barack Obama’s maternal grandmother was very ill at that time and died about a week or so later.  November 3, 2008.

There was an actual recording of his conversation with Maya but he has since deleted it.

Here’s my point:

Throughout this entire saga, Larry Sinclair has exhibited the tendency to only see perceived harm done to him but has never been able to recognize the harm he does to others.

I have to wonder if it’s stupidity, sociopathic behavior or BOTH!

But wait, there’s more.  

The folks over at The Regulator have published everything Sinclair did during and after Madelyn Dunham’s death.

He had heard rumors that Mrs. Dunham may have been murdered or died before the official story’s version.  So he decided to investigate the matter…

You won’t believe it:  http://theregulator.net/?p=9910#comment-216627  (See the blockquote articles.)

Sinclair has a way of injecting himself into a “perceived”  newsworthy story (having anything to do with Barack Obama.)  On more than one occasion  he has looked like a complete idiot by involving himself…only to drop the story with no further updates if it didn’t turn out the way he envisioned it.

Sinclair decries the fact that the Secret Service was parked outside his mother’s house and disturbed the ill, 69 – year old, while bragging about doing something similar but more egregious.  It’s simply astounding.

Website Changes

Pardon the interruption while I decided which website layout would best fit  Sinclair Watch.  I believe that this one is the one I’ll stay with for at least a year a few months.

Thanks for your cooperation and steady readership during this process.

Kstreet

Cell Phone Records…Did Someone Say “Cell Phone Records”?

The following will expose Larry Sinclair’s duplicity and hypocrisy:

Today, Larry Sinclair wrote this:

1. On November 30, 2011 Herman Cain stated on Your World with Neil Cavuto that “he and his Attorney have requested access to Ginger White’s phone records.” Why would Mr. Cain need access to Ms. White’s phone records? Would Mr. Cain agree to release his phone records? Wouldn’t Mr. Cain’s own cell phone records provide him and his attorney with the time frame of the phone calls and text messages between him and Ms. White?

So my questions are similar:

Why would Mr. Sinclair need access to then Senator Obama’s phone records?  Wouldn’t Mr. Sinclair’s own phone records provide him and his attorney with the number of times he called the Obama campaign or the number of times Donald Young called him?

<><><><><><>

A Regulator commenter nails it:

Dennis says:

December 1, 2011 at 11:31 am

Re: Cell Phone Records

What a great idea. Maybe LardBrain would like to release his own cell phone records re: Donald Young and those “calls” he keeps making reference too. Oh right. The phone company won’t give him those records. Yeah, sure, that’s the ticket…Maybe Cain is having the same problem.

<><><><><><>

Following, is a request Sinclair made to obtain Obama’s phone records…with a totally fabricated justification for why he wanted them:

March 9, 2008

RE: REQUEST FOR CELL PHONE AND EMAIL RECORDS 

Dear Senator Obama and Mr. Axelrod:I am submitting this written request asking that you and Mr. Axelrod authorize the release of the following:

1. Cell Phone numbers, service providers for all personal and official cell phones held by Senator Obama for the time period of November 3, 1999 thru November 8, 1999.

2. Cell phone numbers, service providers for all personal and campaign phones for Senator Obama, David Axelrod, David Plouffe from January 18, 2008 to current date or at the least through February 29, 2008.

3. All email communication both personal, campaign related and AKP Message & Media’s from January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008 for Senator Obama, David Axelrod and David Plouffe.

4. All payouts made from AKP Message & Media, Obama for America, David Axelrod, David Plouffe, and Senator Obama’s accounts for the period of January 18, 2008 through February 29, 2008.

This request is being made based on your statement that you intend to bring a new politics to America, a politics of openness, and accountability. The records being requested here can bring to light and/or put to rest claims made about your involvement with Dan Parisi of Whitehouse.com and the rigged polygraph arranged; can if you claim you never met me (as is exactly the claim made by your office directly to John Crewdson of the the Chicago Tribune) show you to be lying or telling the truth by releasing your cell phone records etc…

It would seem to me that you would be more interested in getting this matter settled than your continued organized attacks on the Internet.

I respectfully request you respond to this request without delay. I strongly urge you to consider that you yourself can if these things are , as your staff continue to claim, untrue, then your agreeing to release these records should not be a difficult thing for you to do.

Sincerely,

Larry Sinclair

<><><><><><>

There you have the unmitigated gall and hubris, not to mention show boating and hypocrisy of Larry Sinclair who actually sent a letter to then Senator Obama requesting the above information.

Was it to placate his supporters?  His reasoning about “shedding light on the president’s involvement in Sinclair’s polygraph tests was so bogus and transparent that I’m sure the Obama camp had a huge laugh back then!

It was nothing but hyperbole and showmanship to placate his supporters.  To my knowledge Sinclair never followed up on that original letter.

So, Mr. Sinclair, tell me again, YOU think Herman Cain should NOT request the phone records of Ginger White because…?

“It’s not about the gay sex, truly”

Sure, Larry Sinclair…it was NEVER about the gay sex right?  The number of times that you speculated about Barack Obama having gay sex in other countries, with White House Staff, and with the late choir master of TUCC, Donald Young is too numerous to count.

I use the word speculate, because in every instance, you offer no proof, just a tawdry imagination that seems to embellish more with each subsequent internet radio interview.

<><><><><><>

In Jay’s Analysis we find the answers to Sinclair’s metamorphosis from claiming that he simply wanted to confront Obama about his drug use during their “tryst” in November 1999 to incessantly bringing up the sex angle at every turn and embellishing the sex angle as often as possible.

One can simply read the following transcripts to know that it was ALWAYS about the gay sex and even more so now since the Cain fiasco has been publicized.

Sinclair’s latest post looks at the media’s handling of Ginger White‘s accusations contrasted with the media ignoring his allegations.  So in essence he has ramped up the sex angle to its highest frequency in the last month or so.

<><><><><><>

Larry emphatically states that his allegations about Obama are not about the gay sex, it just had to come out to explain the crack use, with the added little extra that these scandals are a dime a dozen with regards to politicians these days – ho hum [#2] and it wasn’t intended as a reason not to vote for Obama [#16]. But if the gay sex was not an issue why did Larry go on about the implications of Obama getting busted receiving oral sex in the White House [#3], or getting caught in another country where gay sex is illegal [#7] or musing about the character of a man who would receive oral sex from strangers [#17]? Further, it was certainly all about gay sex with his Donald Young story. In truth, he has worked this angle all along.

[#2] 01/23/08: Rense Interview

‘I never had any intentions of coming forward with any allegations of gay sex against Barrack Obama, but in order for them to understand how I knew and how I saw him doing the crack, it had to come out…When I did become aware that he was involved in state politics it wasn’t that much of an issue with me, I have seen politicians from the local level to the US Government level that have been involved in some freaky things… I mean there’s been many it’s not something that is so unique that it would stop you and make you think.’

[#3] 02/05/08: Obama’s Sex & Drug Party pt3 (Sinclair’s words…)

‘Now perhaps you do support Obama and he does make it to the Oval Office and in his first year you know um he’s busted gettin’ head or smoking crack in the White House. You know then you got what you deserve. Right?’

[#7] 02/26/08: Rense Interview

‘What’s going to happen if he does get in office, like you said, and engages in the same behavior with someone in a foreign country to where not only do they blackmail him but say it is one of those countries where homosexuality of any sort is a federal crime to the point where he would be subject to arrest and prosecution.’

‘I honestly believe that before this is over with I am not going to be standing here alone with these allegations – I truly and firmly believe that eventually there are going to be more people that have had relations with Senator Obama who are going to have the guts and the fortitude to finally come out of the closet so to speak and I think when that happens it is going to be too late for this country.’

‘I am raising questions about the validity of his reports, ok. Dr Gordon made it very clear that the computer analysis of the polygrams indicated no deception indicated yet Dr Gelb did not even include in his report the results of the computer analysis of the exam.’

[#16] 07/04/08: Roger Friedinburg

‘I didn’t tell the sex part because, you know, I said it was bad or a reason not to vote for him.’

It was in March that I started becoming aware a Donald Young, who was an openly gay man, a choir director at Trinity United Christian Church, who, ah,…, Barack Obama himself had sent personal condolence letters to his family, after his murder. And I started putting pieces together [went to CPD]…and I told them that I felt that they needed to look into the possibility that Barack Obama and Jeremiah Wright either knew the person that killed Donald Young or actually hired the person that killed Donald Young.’

[#17] 07/16/08: Hal Turner

‘I mean, you know – here’s a man that was smoking crack cocaine, getting blowjobs from an openly gay individual that he never met before that night.’

HT:  Now you allegedly took a lie detector test.

LWS: I took what was supposed to be one, yes.

HT:  And, why don’t you tell the folks what the results were.

LWS:  Well, actually I’m still not sure what the results are, because I still haven’t even been provided the, ahh, the raw data or or anything from it other than the reports provided by Dan Parisi. uhh, Edward Ira Gelb, the fake Ph.d claims that the results said I was lying. the computer analysis of the or uhh what raw data was available, made available to uhh, Gordon Barland (sp) …uhh, according to his report, actually showed that no deception….was indicated. however, he did in fact concur with Edward Gelb’s decision, because he wrote something in there and I think there’s some paragraph in there that uhhh, normally if you have a contradiction between the computer analysis and the human score, you tend to refer to the umm, defer to the human score which…I think that sounds a little fishy.

<><><><><><>

The next installment looks at updated claims from Sinclair that the media has literally ignored him since he broke the “story”.  The most astounding thing I find in all of this, from Jan 17, 2008 when Sinclair came out with his accusatory video, to the present day, is the fact that he has embellished much more since his original You Tube video… with NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER!  He wrote a book that was all about his words and his perception of being picked on but not one iota of evidence.

Yet he compares himself  to the media’s willingness to interview Herman Cain accusers but not him.  In all honesty, as I examine all of this, I have to wonder how Sinclair got away with this deception for so long.  No, not with the mainstream media, but with people who follow him and send him money.  It’s damned incredulous!