The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, expecting different results…
Yankee Clipper of The Regulator gave a link to The New Hampshire Herald website where an article about Larry Sinclair is displayed. Above Sinclair’s “interview” is an “editorial” about Sinclair and his claims. It reads in part:
This story is very important and timely because a few weeks ago, a number of women made unsubstantiated harassment allegations against Herman Cain. The media ran with the stories even when it was increasingly becoming very evident that the allegations had no legs. The uproar caused some character assassination for Cain and ultimately halted his campaign for president.
It is important that the Obama campaign comes out and tells the American people what is known or
unknown about the allegations that Larry Sinclair has made against Obama for all intents and
We are not by any means attempting to suggest here that what Larry Sinclair has told us is the gospel
truth. We’re not in a place to make that judgment. As you read the interview and make your own
research, it is incumbent upon you to arrive at your own conclusions. That’s why we chose a Q&A
format for the story.
Someone ought to tell the editor of this “newspaper” that he is just about four years late with his inquiry. It seems he doesn’t know that the mainstream media has vetted Sinclair’s story from beginning to end and found absolutely no evidence to corroborate his story.
After four years of futile attempts to get attention, Larry Sinclair is trying once again to get publicity for his tired, old, debunked story.
It’s another general election year so Sinclair appears to be trying to recapture the moments when many people were listening and DONATING to his cause which was: ‘to get the word out’. However, back then the myth was new and everyone was curious, especially those who would rather have seen Hillary win the Democratic nomination for the presidency.
There were also the haters and bigots who just couldn’t stand to think of a Black man becoming the possible nominee.
Yet, Larry Sinclair is as persistent as ever to resurrect the Obama/Sinclair/Donald Young ‘story’ again. In my opinion it will be yet another EPIC FAIL.
Yesterday I read where someone called Sarah Palin an “attention whore”. That name better suits Larry Sinclair. Since February 2008, Larry Sinclair has been trying to “sell” his story. There were no takers then, because:
- There was no limo driver to interview
- He failed the polygraph test
- Sinclair had no paper work to show he was even in Chicago at the time that he stated
- Sinclair allegedly gave some phone records to a NY Times reporter, but that was just to show how many times he called the Obama campaign and the reporter never reported on the case
- The alleged hotel record and Choice Hotel Reward letters were either redacted and/or manipulated and therefore disqualified by most observers as false evidence
- An investigation was commissioned to determine the veracity of the hotel receipt (rewards letter) and it was found to have been tampered with by the recipient of the letter/receipt
The above bullet points were summarized from: Deciphering Sinclair’s Evidence.
The Interview – Part 1:
Herald: Larry, it’s only recently we learned
about your story. It’s very surprising that no
major media has done much about it. I
watched your National Press Club interview
online. Was that in 2008?
Larry: Yes. It was on June 18, 2008.
Herald: Since then, what is new about the
Larry: A lot has transpired in the fact that
one of the journalists at the press
conference in 2008 by the name of Wayne
Madsen; he’s been in journalism in
Washington DC for quite some time. And he’
s a former Navy intelligence. He is one of the
journalists that after the press conference
started writing articles similar to those of the
But he had contacted me in 2009/2010 and
started telling me he has changed his mind
and started believing everything I had said.
The NH Herald claims that they will have more of this interview in their next issue so stay tuned…