A Closer Look At Larry Sinclair’s Inconsistent Story – Part 3
The elusive limo driver in Larry Sinclair’s meme has taken a back seat to Sinclair’s most dramatic “revelations” about Donald Young. When the DY storyline appeared, the limo driver storyline declined significantly.
02/08/08: The Right Perspective Interview with Larry Sinclair: I’ve got, listen, I have the limo driver. Everybody keeps telling me on You Tube, “Put your information out here. Let us investigate it.” I’m not that stupid. Are you kidding me? Everybody on You Tube is trying to kill me…you know…um threaten me…I don’t mean “kill [...]
02/17/08: Cao’s Interview with Larry Sinclair Caller: Wants to know when the limo driver will come forward. Larry: …Now there are some issues that surround the company and some of those issues are immigration issues I don’t know if those pertain to the driver himself. I do know the driver was family members to the [...]
01/23/08: Rense Interview I was introduced to Mr Obama when I got out of the limo, by the driver, apparently they were friends. I was speaking to the driver, the privacy window was down at that time and like I said, that was when I was made very clear at the time that the driver [...]
Jay pointed out some observations about the limo driver aspect in Sinclair’s book in a relatively recent email to me:
His newly revealed story that Jagir Multani is connected to Rezko comes off as an opportunistic embellishment playing off the infamy of Rezko, just like he played off the death of Donald Young.
Again – like mum not knowing the phone numbers and not being in any yearbooks – Larry seems to spend undue effort justifying why there were ‘typos’ with regards to the Limo Driver’s name in his press conference. This time it is missing luggage that ends up in Paris, also conveniently justifying his buying some new threads on his supporters’ dime.
How many changes did the limo drivers name go through? First it was P. Multani on YouTube, then at the NPC – Paramjit Multani, amended verbally to Jagir Paramjit Multani, then in the statement released afterwards to Jagir P Multani and then finally to just Jagir Multani in the book? This is reminiscent of a kid trying to slip the beans under his dinner plate, hoping no one will notice.
…and finally in summation:
He also claimed that he had never promised to give the name of the limo driver to Parisi. In an email dated Sunday 24 Feb at 1.26pm Parisi makes it clear that Larry promised this over the phone when they had spoken on the Friday (22 Feb 08 – date of the Polygraph), calling him out for not providing the information. Larry’s immediate response to Parisi was:
‘No, I can not and will not, you are posting that I lied, why would I put him in the middle of your firestorm now?’
Why did he give a name for the limo driver (P. Multani) during his meltdown on the night/early morning of 22-23 Feb 08 if there had been no established expectation that his was something he HAD to deliver on?
Further, why would he send an email to Parisi that said he was not going to give the information ‘now’. The use of the term ‘now’ indicates he acknowledges a change has occurred to the initial understanding between them based on the fact that the polygraph
results had not gone the way he wanted them to (ergo he had a tanty).Further, if you had just failed the polygraph and claimed it was rigged, what purpose would it serve to withhold the limo driver – the one person who could provide you with the corroborating evidence that you so desperately needed – who could have squashed the failed polygraph better than any soon to be created fabrication about conversations with Donald Young could ever have done?
The simple answer is he never had a limo driver to give up and he had made a promise he was unable to keep because he could not deliver on a lie.