The Regulator Too has an additional administrator and Meesh has done wonders for the place.
Meesh’s latest post is called More Teachable Moments By Dennis.
Dennis’ first teachable moment (a comment he wrote to Sinclair on July 17, 2012) is here. You’ll have to scroll down a bit and look for the professor icon.
The original date of this post was January 4, 2012. This is a re-post.
The following is an excerpt from an article for The Today Show online called Why people lie — and how to tell if they are by Gail Saltz. It’s simply a heads-up before reading the piece that I wrote below.
A much more troubling group is those who lie a lot — and knowingly — for personal gain. These people may have a diagnosis called antisocial personality disorder, also known as a sociopath, and often get into scrapes with the law. Lying often gets worse with the passage of time. When you get away with a lie it often impels you to continue your deceptions. Also, liars often find themselves perpetrating more untruths to cover themselves.
I’m still waiting for the New Hampshire Herald’s second installment of Larry Sinclair’s interview. You see, I am certain that in 2012 there will most certainly be some sort of add-on or left out part of the story. So I held my breath, read the entire first installment and I must say, there were some minor changes to his story but the following, particularly caught my attention.
Larry speaks to the New Hampshire Herald…
Larry: The oral sex started, and then stopped for a minute, long enough for me to actually retrieve a
lighter from the cup holder behind me for him to light the pipe. And then I returned performing the oral
sex on him after he had started kidding the crack pipe saying it actually made him harder during sex. I
didn’t believe that. But you know some people have different fantasies. I would say the oral sex from
beginning to end probably was 10-15 minutes at the most.
Now everyone knew that Barack Obama was a smoker at the time and more than likely carried his own lighter with him. And surely a “crack-head” would have also kept a lighter with him at all times. But that’s just nit-picking. Here is the real discrepancy. Sinclair was administered a polygraph test by two different polygraph experts.
For obvious reasons, Sinclair and his minions have successfully overshadowed the results of the polygraph tests by not mentioning them at all. They repeat the “story” over and over again and of course, true to Goebbels’ word, more and more people started believing the story.
According to Gelb and Borland, Sinclair failed the polygraph tests. Gelb said his polygraphs indicated deception on the issue of oral sex. Borland qualified by saying that no test is “perfectly conducted” but that as far as he could see, he was in agreement with Gelb
Gelb’s Report on oral sex question (1st series):
“The issue under consideration dealt with Sinclair’s representation that he had performed oral sex on Barack Obama in 1999. During an extensive pre-test interview, Sinclair emphatically asserted the sex act took place in a limousine rented by him in the Chicago area…Two target questions: Did you perform oral sex on Obama in 1999? Are you lying when you say you performed oral sex on Obama in 1999? The…polygrams were hand-scored as required by the Government in a PCA examination. To render a conclusion of deception there must be a… -3 in any spot or…a grand total of -4 for both spots. Sinclair’s polygrams resulted in an evaluation of “deception indication” with a score of -15 (for the oral sex questions).”
Barland: QC review of Larry Sinclair polygraph
Although no examination is perfectly conducted I believe that the irregularities in
this examination would be more likely to create an inconclusive result than.”an erroneous
one”.However, these charts are not inconclusive. Based-upon my review of this
examination, I concur in Mr. Gelb’s finding that Mr. Sinclair was n0t telling the complete
truth in his claims to have engaged in oral sex with Senator Obama and that Senator Obama used cocaine in his presence .
However, in the interest of fairness, in addition to the epic fail of the polygraph tests, Sinclair has been morphing his story about the reason he contacted the Obama camp in the first place.
Original story line:
01/23/08: Rense Interview
‘I first decided to approach Obama’s camp in September…I had sent the Obama campaign several emails to their campaign website addressing the issue…I was ignored’.
02/08/08: The Right Perspective Interview with Larry Sinclair -
‘Actually, it’s funny. Everybody keeps saying, “now”. I’ve been trying to get this out since last fall and, umm, You Tube was pretty much a last resort…I mean, it should’ve come out back last fall when I first reported it, umm, to NBC [corrects self] MSNBC…I didn’t really want to come out on You Tube like that because I didn’t think it was the right way to do it. And I tried every possible way, ah, to come out with it.…I was actually, you know, inspired by Barack Obama as well until I saw a young person last fall, and saw Obama make a statement to this person that you know, hey, “I’ve admitted to what I’ve done in the past, but I didn’t…I haven’t done it since my teens”.’
Compare and Contrast:
12/11: New Hampshire Herald
Herald: Between 1999 and 2004 it was five years. You met Obama only very briefly. So five years after
you could still recognize his face?
Larry: Let me explain something to you. My grandmother is 96 years old. She will tell you when I visit her
I can tell her things that happened in her house when I was a kid, when my grandfather was still alive all
the way down to the type of clothes that either one of us was wearing at the time. My memory is excellent.Herald: So you are sitting there in Mexico and Obama is addressing the convention?
Larry: I see him at the convention on TV. And again, I am in Mexico. It doesn’t bother me at all. I don’t
care. I’m just looking at another politician, winding his mouth, and I’m thinking ok, he’s definitely in the
right line of business! And again, it didn’t make any difference to me. I’m not from Chicago. I’m not
represented by the guy. It doesn’t bother me. What bothers me was in 2007, I happened to be watching
TV. I saw some female young people talking about how excited they were about Barack Obama. Saying
that he was this new kind of politician who was very transparent. That everybody knew everything about
him. And I’m like you don’t know everything about him. And they kept talking about the fact that he has
been so open and honest about his drug use and I’m like no, he hasn’t. Because his official stand was
that he hasn’t used drugs since high school. Then a couple of months later, it changed to well, when I
was in college I used this and now every now and then a little coke when we could afford it. Then the
campaign changed again to yeah, he hasn’t used drugs since high school. So when I saw that, it just
kind of appealed to me the wrong way. And that’s when I contacted his campaign and told them he
needs to come clean about the extent of his drug use.
The following is an excerpt from an article for The Today Show online called Why people lie — and how to tell if they are by Gail Saltz. It’s simply a heads-up before reading the piece that I wrote below.
A much more troubling group is those who lie a lot — and knowingly — for personal gain. These people may have a diagnosis called antisocial personality disorder, also known as being a sociopath, and often get into scrapes with the law. Lying often gets worse with the passage of time. When you get away with a lie it often impels you to continue your deceptions. Also, liars often find themselves perpetrating more untruths to cover themselves.
I’m still waiting for the New Hampshire Herald’s second installment of Larry Sinclair’s interview. You see, I am certain that in 2012 there will most certainly be some sort of add-on or left out part of the story. So I held my breath, read the entire first installment and I must say, there were some minor changes to his story but the following, particularly caught my attention.
Larry speaks to the New Hampshire Herald…
Larry: The oral sex started, and then stopped for a minute, long enough for me to actually retrieve a
lighter from the cup holder behind me for him to light the pipe. And then I returned performing the oral
sex on him after he had started kidding the crack pipe saying it actually made him harder during sex. I
didn’t believe that. But you know some people have different fantasies. I would say the oral sex from
beginning to end probably was 10-15 minutes at the most.
Now everyone knew that Barack Obama was a smoker at the time and more than likely carried his own lighter with him. And surely a “crack-head” would have also kept a lighter with him at all times. But that’s just nit-picking. Here is the real discrepancy. Sinclair was administered a polygraph test by two different polygraph experts.
For obvious reasons, Sinclair and his minions have successfully overshadowed the results of the polygraph tests by not mentioning them at all. They repeat the “story” over and over again and of course, true to Goebbels’ word, more and more people started believing the story.
According to Gelb and Borland, Sinclair failed the polygraph tests. Gelb said his polygraphs indicated deception on the issue of oral sex. Borland qualified by saying that no test is “perfectly conducted” but that as far as he could see, he was in agreement with Gelb
Gelb’s Report on oral sex question (1st series):
“The issue under consideration dealt with Sinclair’s representation that he had performed oral sex on Barack Obama in 1999. During an extensive pre-test interview, Sinclair emphatically asserted the sex act took place in a limousine rented by him in the Chicago area…Two target questions: Did you perform oral sex on Obama in 1999? Are you lying when you say you performed oral sex on Obama in 1999? The…polygrams were hand-scored as required by the Government in a PCA examination. To render a conclusion of deception there must be a… -3 in any spot or…a grand total of -4 for both spots. Sinclair’s polygrams resulted in an evaluation of “deception indication” with a score of -15 (for the oral sex questions).”
Barland: QC review of Larry Sinclair polygraph
Although no examination is perfectly conducted I believe that the irregularities in
this examination would be more likely to create an inconclusive result than.”an erroneous
one”.However, these charts are not inconclusive. Based-upon my review of this
examination, I concur in Mr. Gelb’s finding that Mr. Sinclair was n0t telling the complete
truth in his claims to have engaged in oral sex with Senator Obama and that Senator Obama used cocaine in his presence .
However, in the interest of fairness, in addition to the epic fail of the polygraph tests, Sinclair has been morphing his story about the reason he contacted the Obama camp in the first place.
Original story line:
01/23/08: Rense Interview
‘I first decided to approach Obama’s camp in September…I had sent the Obama campaign several emails to their campaign website addressing the issue…I was ignored’.
02/08/08: The Right Perspective Interview with Larry Sinclair -
‘Actually, it’s funny. Everybody keeps saying, “now”. I’ve been trying to get this out since last fall and, umm, You Tube was pretty much a last resort…I mean, it should’ve come out back last fall when I first reported it, umm, to NBC [corrects self] MSNBC…I didn’t really want to come out on You Tube like that because I didn’t think it was the right way to do it. And I tried every possible way, ah, to come out with it.…I was actually, you know, inspired by Barack Obama as well until I saw a young person last fall, and saw Obama make a statement to this person that you know, hey, “I’ve admitted to what I’ve done in the past, but I didn’t…I haven’t done it since my teens”.’
Compare and Contrast:
12/11: New Hampshire Herald
Herald: Between 1999 and 2004 it was five years. You met Obama only very briefly. So five years after
you could still recognize his face?
Larry: Let me explain something to you. My grandmother is 96 years old. She will tell you when I visit her
I can tell her things that happened in her house when I was a kid, when my grandfather was still alive all
the way down to the type of clothes that either one of us was wearing at the time. My memory is excellent.Herald: So you are sitting there in Mexico and Obama is addressing the convention?
Larry: I see him at the convention on TV. And again, I am in Mexico. It doesn’t bother me at all. I don’t
care. I’m just looking at another politician, winding his mouth, and I’m thinking ok, he’s definitely in the
right line of business! And again, it didn’t make any difference to me. I’m not from Chicago. I’m not
represented by the guy. It doesn’t bother me. What bothers me was in 2007, I happened to be watching
TV. I saw some female young people talking about how excited they were about Barack Obama. Saying
that he was this new kind of politician who was very transparent. That everybody knew everything about
him. And I’m like you don’t know everything about him. And they kept talking about the fact that he has
been so open and honest about his drug use and I’m like no, he hasn’t. Because his official stand was
that he hasn’t used drugs since high school. Then a couple of months later, it changed to well, when I
was in college I used this and now every now and then a little coke when we could afford it. Then the
campaign changed again to yeah, he hasn’t used drugs since high school. So when I saw that, it just
kind of appealed to me the wrong way. And that’s when I contacted his campaign and told them he
needs to come clean about the extent of his drug use.
Well my first impulse is to say, I hope he is in the depths of hell getting every bit of the karmic justice he deserves.
The liar Sinclair always told his gullible minion that he’d “never go away”.
Tjtaygee has a great post for Larry and his enablers…
Another one of our favorite bloggers over at The Regulator sums it up for us:
Where’s The Proof, Larry? says:
“I’ve made it clear that I’m not going away. I’ll do whatever it takes” SickLiar, Feb 5, 2008
“The issue is far from over and let me assure you that I am not going away, the story will get out” SickLiar Mar 1, 2008
“I want to tell you right now that the only thing you have done by having my life repeatedly threatened, and by repeatedly providing out right false information for your supporters to post about me on the web, is to make certain that I will not go away and I will not rest until the truth about you both is across every headline around the world. ” SickLiar in letter to Senator Obama Mar 2, 2008
“But it turned out exactly the way I thought it would, you know, no one was willing to look me face to face, you know they figured the more they ignore it you know eventually it’s going to go away and I think they understand I am in DC not to let things go away.
….
He is going to have to answer whether indeed he did crack cocaine in a limousine with Larry Sinclair, in November 1999, because I refuse to go away until he does. ” SickLiar May 29, 2008
….“Barack Obama IS a “Dead Man Walking”,” SickLiar, Feb 19 2010, prior to his own “suicide attempt” of Sept 2010
“I will continue to move forward with my run for congress.” SickLiar Feb 22 2010
“It the bastards can’t take it they should not be dishing it out.” SickLiar Jan 28th, 2010
“Lawrence W. Sinclair and Sinclair Publishing, Inc will vigorously defend against this frivolous law suit brought by Daniel Parisi, infamous Internet Pornographer and stand firmly on the truth. “Truth” is an absolute defense against libel and slander. It is the position of Lawrence W. Sinclair and Sinclair Publishing, Inc. that the statements in the book Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder? Published June 2009 is truthful and factual.
Lawrence W. Sinclair and Sinclair Publishing, Inc are confident we will prevail and in doing so will expose Daniel Parisi, members of the Obama administration and Barack Obama himself for the frauds they are.”
Larry Sinclair has requested that this information be forwarded to as many press and media outlets as possible.” SickLiar, June 8, 2010
But SickLiar, ‘the gutless punk’, is the one who has “gone away”.
FUCK YOU, LARRY!!! Buh bye.
This one’s for you, you POS con man, liar, grifter and internet bully: (H/T neonzx)
PHUCK YOU, LARRY! Stay wherever the hell you are.
Larry Sinclair released two videos late yesterday. One was a general video and one was addressed to his family.
The “family” video was about 37 minutes long. It’s this audio/video that I want to discuss. Actually it’s the first 10 minutes of Sinclair’s “Family Video”.
Sinclair starts out by saying that he was naive to think that he actually could get the Obama campaign to respond to him. Sinclair said he thought by contacting the Obama campaign to “come clean” about his drug use, that they would respond in kind.
Sinclair tried to say something about since Obama purchased the drugs (with Sinclair’s money) had Obama gotten caught he would have been arrested for selling drugs to Sinclair. In my mind it was a far fetched attempt to make Obama look guilty to show his family that he wasn’t lying, I suppose.
He also mentioned Jerome Corsi’s book and how the Obama camp sent out a 40 page response to the Corsi book called Unfit For Publication.
It sounded to me as though Sinclair was somehow apologizing to his family for failing in the Obama fiasco, yet he goes on to say that the two proudest things he’s done is to publish his book and the author Thornton Parson’s book.
The rest of the audio goes on to address each family member. However, I want to go back to Sinclair’s assertion that Obama should have “come clean” about his drug use.
We’ve been down this road before. Jay wrote an extensive expose of Sinclair’s lies regarding WHY he wanted Obama to come clean. While the entire report can be found here (p3)…this is the gist of the “Big Lie”:
Sinclair made the following statement repeatedly on several different interviews (see dossier.) Also see Debunking Larry Sinclair In A Nutshell.
02/08/08: The Right Perspective Interview with Larry Sinclair
01:26:02 LWS: I was actually, you know, inspired by Barack Obama as well until I saw a young person last fall, and saw Obama make a statement to this person that you know, hey, “I’ve admitted to what I’ve done in the past, but I didn’t…I haven’t done it [DRUGS] since my teens” and I’m going, okay, here’s a person who is coming across to the American people saying, “Trust me with your lives. I’m honest. I’m transparent. I’m everything that nobody else in Washington can say they are.” When you do that, then you need to live up to that. That’s why I brought this out. So When Did Larry First Contact The Campaign?
“I contacted Senator Obama’s campaign as early as September of last year [2007], giving Mr. Obama the opportunity to correct his statement regarding his drug use”.
The first time Obama brought up his teenage drug on the campaign trail – to a group of young people – was in late November 2007, two months AFTER Larry claimed he contacted the campaign asking Obama to correct this statement. Therefore the reason he gave for going after Obama is FALSE.
Sinclair’s purpose for “outing” Obama was totally debunked!
So if indeed Sinclair has recorded his last words…I’m here to set the record straight. H/t Jay.
