I started typing a post about Larry Sinclair’s manifesto, in which he whines and complains that he, and he alone is the victim of a four year plot to discredit his unproven and uncorroborated tale about then State Senator Barack Obama which includes drugs, sex and even murder.
Then I realized, while trying to rebutt what Sinclair was saying with real proof, I found myself getting caught up in the insanity and delusion called Why Larry Matters in 2012?
While trying to decipher and defend his accusations against me and others, my post was getting wordy…similar to Sinclair’s own post. So I’ve abandoned that project and decided this would be a better format to straighten out the real record:
(Note:) I’ve added links when possible to give a source to some of the following observations. Emphasis is also mine.
Dennis says:
Part Two of LardButt’s pointless jabbering is up and it is extremely unreadable, incoherent, and largely a floating pile of paranoid rubbish. His story matters because…then he wastes lots of time attacking mitch and nan, kstreet, TJ, the entire Regulator site (BTW, did you know that we are engaged in criminal activities – wow, are we going to start having meetings in semi-darken rooms with some guy called Don?), all lined up by way of random and largely non-existent links and utterly pointless diatribes.
Since most of his crap has to do with events that he claims took place in 2008, he kind of fails at giving the reader any clue why his bullshit matters now. Many of his accusations against other people seem to be based on nothing and gee gosh golly, he again fails to produce any evidence of anything. Obviously, lots of his claims is based upon a wild state of projection because he actually was running around trying to do this sort of crap against other people. BTW, most of his emails from Microsoft sounds like a call center employee trying to politely deal with a nut for a customer. Doesn’t he ever read his own crap?
RuhRoh says:
You nailed it, Dennis.
His article has nothing to do with “why his original tale matters” and is simply one more excuse for Larry to whine and complain about perceived slights and then to accuse others of the things that he not only has been doing all along, but continues to do in the current article.
I’d expect Part III to be similar.
Since most of his crap has to do with events that he claims took place in 2008, he kind of fails at giving the reader any clue why his bullshit matters now. Many of his accusations against other people seem to be based on nothing and gee gosh golly, he again fails to produce any evidence of anything.
That is the longest piece of PSYCHO-BABBLE I have ever seen! It’s a narcissist’s ramblings in an incoherent format!
Ok, he jumps on me but gets it all wrong:
He’s concentrating on the cigarette lighter when I said in my piece that I was nit-picking and went on to discuss the lie about oral sex.
The polygraph exams determined by BOTH operators that the oral sex portion of the exam was deceptive!
Even THAT is irrelevant in the context of his entire rambling piece. Dennis you’re right, it’s nothing but an “utterly pointless diatribe”. You pegged it!
Dennis says:
Part that sums it all up: “The actual facts are Larry Sinclair has a criminal record from 1980 through 1986….”
OK butt wipe, let explain to your dear readers (all five of them) a couple of points. Prior to 1980, your criminal activities were under the under age rule and cannot be made public. After 1986, you were spending lots of time in prison. Once out, you were back into criminal activities, hence the outstanding arrest warrant in Colorado. You were arrested in Washington on a warrant from Delaware and only beat the rap because you made amends to the victim who then dropped the charges. By any form of normal classification,you are a life long professional criminal. You have never had any kind of real job and the only time you were not involved in criminal (or at the very least, suspect) activities has been when you were serving time for various convictions involving criminal activities.
Gee, for a guy with a “lwa” degree, you seem to have a lot of trouble understanding basic legal points.
kstreet67 says:
Now THIS is laughable:
…not a single media organization nor anyone else has been able to poke a single hole in Sinclair’s story.
and then this (which must have really bothered him when I wrote it:)
Someone ought to tell the editor of this “newspaper” that he is just about four years late with his inquiry. It seems he doesn’t know that the mainstream media has vetted Sinclair’s story from beginning to end and found absolutely no evidence to corroborate his story.
Then his response to my statement:
Not only has the “mainstream” media not vetted Sinclair’s story, the claims they originally put out in 2008 have come back to bite them. Reporters Admit Not Looking Into Obama Allegations In Fight Over Palin Piece. As noted above David Weigel had a passion for linking to other stories he felt reinforced his position on Sinclair. One of the links Weigel used was from Greta Van Susteren
Did he not say that The Chicago Tribune The New York Times and The New York Post all sent people out to Minnesota to talk with him? Uh, Duh, that’s called “vetting”, i.e., evaluation and examination of the alleged “facts”.
Some Lwa degree you got SFB!
TJTaygee says:
YAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
that’s it? no proof of his allegations against obama – again?
Just an insane rambling which he’ll copy & paste into his next book?
Wheee – i got a mention. just another of his completely made-up and unsupported implications.
someone remind me to be skeered.
What. A. Dud.
Dennis says:
BTW, among the many “suspect” activities he has currently been engaged in, let’s not forget his bogus run for Congress. Let’s see, he claimed he had a filing date as an independent candidate coming up when in fact it was long past; could only accept donations for $299 or less because otherwise he would have to file a report with the FEC and we wouldn’t want him bothered with the paperwork (I can’t believe the kind of dumb fucks who fall for this shit); only campaign stop he made was a Eat and Greet and he was there for the free food; never bothered to prove that he was even allowed to vote in the state of Florida (when asked in a radio interview, the Blob went on a long rant about all the states he could vote in and never bothered to get back to the question regarding Florida. As an ex-convict who has served time in Florida, he would have to file a request with the court to get his voting rights restored. Simple legal process and if he had done it, he could simply show the goddamn paperwork.
So it is a reasonable assumption that his “run for congress” was a “gag” for donations from a bunch of nitwits who act as if they were born and bred to be fleeced by a low life piece of scum.
RuhRoh says:
Dennis,
Let’s also not overlook that Larry has repeatedly bragged in interviews that at the time of his alleged “enounters” with Obama, he was heavily into transporting drugs and illegal aliens.
[Editor's Notes]: I’ll look for the interview transcripts and post here as soon as I can.
YankeeClipper says:
RuhRoh says:
January 10, 2012 at 12:59 pm
Dennis,Let’s also not overlook that Larry has repeatedly bragged in interviews that at the time of his alleged “enounters” with Obama, he was heavily into transporting drugs and illegal aliens.
Earning hundreds of thousands of tax free dollars in the process.
Glix says:
The actual facts are Larry Sinclair has a criminal record from 1980 through 1986….”
He went to prison in 1986 until the late 1990’s and completely ignores the fact that he got in lots of trouble while he was in there. His list of infractions is a yard long and includes actions that would be a crime on the outside.
